The effect of urban wastewater treated by trickling filter on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth

Authors

  • Radouane Soujoud Data Science for Sustainable Earth Laboratory (Data4Earth), Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, 23000 Beni Mellal, Morocco Author
  • Aziz Oubenali Laboratory of Biotechnology and Sustainable Development of Natural Resources, Polydisciplinary Faculty, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, 23000 Beni Mellal, Morocco Author
  • Youssef Khachtib Laboratory of Agro-Industrial and Medical Biotechnologies, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, 23000 Beni Mellal, Morocco Author
  • Tawfik El Moussaoui Laboratory of Mining, Environment and Materials (MEM Lab), Environmental Engineering and Innovation (2EI) research team, Department of Mines, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Rabat (ENSMR), Ave Hadj Ahmed Cherkaoui – BP 753, Agdal, Rabat, Morocco Author
  • Malika Ourribane Data Science for Sustainable Earth Laboratory (Data4Earth), Faculty of Sciences and Technics, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, 23000 Beni Mellal, Morocco Author

Keywords:

Chickpea growth, treated wastewater analysis, treated wastewater reuse, Trickling filter, Water status

Abstract

The irrigation with treated wastewater (TWW) can be a promising solution to mitigate the dependence on fresh water in agriculture. For this purpose and after physicochemical analysis of TWW (T°, pH, electrical conductivity, TSS, BOD5, COD, PO43-, TKN, Cl-, etc.), their effect on the agro-physiological parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) was assessed. Indeed, a pot experiment was conducted under natural conditions for eight weeks using different ratios of TWW against natural water (NW) as control. Results showed that TWW was classified as non-biodegradable (BOD5/COD < 0.3). For chickpea responses, result proved that the 75% TWW showed the best effects on chickpea growth, in terms of plant height, leaf area, shoot fresh and dry weight, with an improvement of 18.5%, 62.3%, 13.0% and 25.6% respectively than control plants. Moreover, an appearance of flowers and pods was observed by this dilution (75%) with an increase in chlorophyll content by 8.2% and 41.3% than chickpea under NW and 100% TWW, respectively. In contrast, no remarkable difference was stated between plants growth irrigated with NW and those irrigated with 100% TWW, the last one is the only one that does not result in any flowering than all other treatment. For water status, the relative water content was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in chickpea irrigated with 100% TWW than other treatment and control plants. In conclusion, the random use of this TWW in raw form present a risk for chickpea plants. However, TWW diluted at 75% can be recommended for irrigation purpose.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-29